Skip to content
    Flowith logo

    Flowith Review

    AI Agents
    8.8/10

    Reviewed by

    Updated 7 min readEditorially reviewed

    Quick facts

    Starting price
    Free (300 one-time credits); Pro $19.90/mo or $17.91/mo billed yearly
    Free plan
    Yes
    Best for
    Researchers, content creators and solo operators who want many AI models, image and video generation and an agent in one canvas instead of separate subscriptions
    Platforms
    Web app, iOS app

    BestStacked Score

    8.8/10

    Weighted average of 5 categories. Methodology below.

    Ease of Use20%8.4
    Features25%9.3
    Pricing20%9.0
    Support15%9.0
    Integrations20%8.0

    Quick answer

    Is Flowith worth paying for?

    It can be, if you'd otherwise pay for several AI tools. Flowith puts chat models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and DeepSeek, image and video models and its Agent Neo on one branching canvas. Pro is $19.90 a month or $17.91 billed yearly, for 20,000 credits a month. Credits reset each billing cycle, and the free Starter plan gives 300 one-time credits.

    Cheapest paid plan
    Pro: $19.90/mo, or $17.91/mo billed yearly ($214.92 a year), with 20,000 credits a month, 40+ premium models and batch mode.
    Annual only
    The Unlimited Pack, which makes selected image and video models free to run, comes only with yearly Ultimate and Infinite.
    Refunds are narrow
    Flowith refunds only within 48 hours of payment and only if you've used fewer than 200 paid credits.
    Skip it if
    You need an API, team accounts or permanent storage. The API is "coming soon", accounts are single-user, and stored content is kept for six months as standard.

    The Verdict

    Flowith packs a lot into one subscription. A $19.90 Pro plan covers frontier chat models, more than a dozen image models, Seedance, Kling, Wan and Veo video models, and Agent Neo, which plans and runs multi-step jobs such as deep research, slide decks and websites. The canvas lets you branch a conversation and pull several replies into one prompt. The catches: credits reset monthly, the Unlimited Pack needs an annual Ultimate or Infinite plan, refunds end after 48 hours, standard storage is six months, and there's no API or team plan. For solo creators and researchers juggling several AI subscriptions, it's a strong consolidation option. We score it 8.8/10.

    Best for

    Solo creators, researchers and marketers who want chat, image, video and an agent in one place and are comfortable managing a credit balance.

    Skip if

    You need a team workspace, an API, predictable flat-rate pricing, or a tool that keeps your files indefinitely.

    AlternativesChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity

    The Background

    What Is Flowith?

    Flowith is an AI workspace built around a canvas instead of a chat thread. Every prompt and reply becomes a node you can continue, branch or quote later, so a session becomes a visual map. You pick a mode (Chat, Image, Video, Slides, Website or Neo Agent) and a model. Its updates page lists recent chat additions such as Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol, Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.7. Agent Neo breaks a goal into steps and adjusts as results come in, and Knowledge Garden stores your documents as reusable context. Flowith is run by Flowith Technologies Pte. Ltd. in Singapore and is available on the web and as an iOS app.

    The Product

    Flowith Features: What You Actually Get

    Branching canvas

    Each input and response is a node you can continue, branch or reference. Flowith offers two interaction modes: Follow-up First, which keeps a thread's full history for drilling into one answer, and Quote First, which lets you select replies from different branches and combine them in one prompt. You can also add comments and search across nodes.

    A strategist asks for three campaign angles, branches each into its own thread, then quotes the best parts of all three into one summary prompt.

    Agent Neo

    Neo turns a goal into what Flowith calls a dynamic Recipe: it plans a step, runs it, checks the result and picks the next step, switching tools if one fails. You can let it choose the output or set it to Text, Image, Video, Slides or Website, and pick Max or Fast reasoning. Flowith says Neo leads the GAIA agent benchmark; that's the vendor's claim.

    A consultant asks Neo for a competitor research report with sources, then has it turn the findings into a slide deck on the same canvas.

    Neo's tool set

    Flowith's docs list the tools Neo can call, including web search, a live browser, image and tweet search, document and image generation, 3D models from an image, webpage and app building, video storyboards and clips, music, speech, and emailing you the results.

    A founder asks Neo to research a market, build a one-page site from the findings and email the result when it's done.

    Image and video models

    The pricing page lists image models including Nano Banana Pro, Nano Banana 2 and 2.1, GPT Image 2 and 2.5, Seedream 5.0, Grok Image 2.0 and Z Image Turbo, and video models including Seedance 2.0 and 2.5, Kling 3.0 and V2.6 Pro, Wan and Veo 3.1. Each has a published credit cost, such as 80 credits per Nano Banana Pro image at 1K or 2K.

    An ecommerce seller generates product shots in two image models side by side on the canvas, then animates the winner into a short video.

    Knowledge Garden

    Knowledge Garden holds separate knowledge bases (for example brand voice, coding rules or research notes) that you attach to a flow or to Neo. You add content by typing, uploading images, PDFs, Markdown, text or Microsoft Office files, or importing a web link. A Knowledge Market lets people share knowledge bases.

    A freelance writer uploads a client's style guide and past articles, then attaches that knowledge base to every draft for that client.

    Slides and websites

    Slides and Website are their own modes, run by Agent Neo. Flowith's comparison table estimates about 22 slide decks or 92 website builds a month on Pro, 70 or 294 on Ultimate, and 1 each on the free plan. These are vendor estimates.

    A teacher turns a research paper into a 20-page presentation, and a small business owner drafts a landing page from a short brief.

    Sharing and collaboration

    Any canvas can be shared by link as a view-only replay, and you can give individual members edit rights to change inputs, rerun nodes and add files. Accounts themselves are single-user.

    A researcher shares a finished canvas with a colleague as a replay, then grants edit access so the colleague can rerun one branch with new data.

    Feature recap

    • Branching canvas with Follow-up First and Quote First modes
    • Agent Neo for multi-step research, documents, slides, video and sites
    • Chat models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and DeepSeek
    • 40+ premium models on paid plans, with per-model credit costs
    • Knowledge Garden knowledge bases from files, text and links
    • Image and video batch mode on paid plans
    • Canvas sharing with view-only or edit access
    • Commercial license on paid plans

    The Numbers

    Flowith Pricing: Every Plan Explained

    Flowith sells four plans in US dollars, with a Monthly toggle and a Yearly toggle (also labelled Unlimited Mode). Yearly takes 10% off Pro and Ultimate and 20% off Infinite. Every plan is credit-based, and subscription credits reset at the end of each billing cycle. Prices checked on October 11, 2026.

    PlanMonthlyAnnualIncluded FeaturesBest For
    Starter$0$0300 one-time credits (Flowith says about 4 Nano Banana Pro images), limited models, no batch generation, no commercial licenseTrying the canvas before paying
    ProBest value$19.90$17.91/mo ($214.92/yr)20,000 credits a month; yearly adds $4 of free generations. 40+ premium models, image and video batch mode, top-up packs, 50 concurrent tasks, commercial licenseSolo users replacing one or two AI subscriptions
    Ultimate$49.90$44.91/mo ($538.92/yr)50,000 credits plus $38 of free generations a month, 100 concurrent tasks. Yearly adds the Unlimited Pack (GPT Image 2 at medium quality, Nano Banana 2, Seedream 5.0 Flash; Kling V2.6 Pro for 30 days)Creators who generate images and video every day
    Infinite$449.91 shown ($499.90 list)$399.92/mo ($4,799.04/yr)500,000 credits plus $188 of free generations a month, unlimited concurrent tasks, full-year Unlimited Pack on yearly billing. API listed as coming soonHigh-volume production

    Pro is the plan most people should price. It costs about the same as ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro, and 20,000 credits buy, by Flowith's own estimate, about 250 Nano Banana Pro images or 2,000 GPT Image 2.5 images. The billing cycle matters: monthly Pro has no free generations, and Ultimate's Unlimited Pack only comes with annual billing. Two numbers on the pricing page disagree: the yearly Pro card says 20,000 credits plus $4 of free generations, while the comparison table says 22,000 credits. Infinite lists at $499.90 a month, but the Monthly toggle showed $449.91 on October 11. Per-model credit figures are estimates at the lowest settings, so higher resolution costs more. Top-up packs exist on paid plans, but their prices aren't on the pricing page.

    Pricing scenarios

    What Flowith costs, and what the credits buy

    These are our calculations from Flowith's published prices and per-model credit costs on October 11, 2026, not quotes. Actual credit use can be higher than Flowith's estimates.

    Calculation 1, monthly vs yearly Pro. Monthly is $19.90 × 12 = $238.80 a year. Yearly is $214.92, saving $23.88, plus $4 of free generations a month. But Flowith doesn't convert annual plans to monthly or prorate annual refunds.

    Calculation 2, image work on Pro. 20,000 credits ÷ 80 credits per Nano Banana Pro image = 250 images a month. At 45 credits per Nano Banana 2 image at 1K, that's about 444 images. On video, 20,000 ÷ 617 credits per 5-second Seedance 2.5 clip at 480p is about 32 clips, or roughly 160 seconds a month.

    Calculation 3, Ultimate. Monthly is $49.90 × 12 = $598.80 a year without the Unlimited Pack. Yearly is $538.92 with it, $59.88 cheaper.

    Calculation 4, replacing subscriptions. ChatGPT Plus plus Claude Pro is $20 + $20 = $40 a month. Flowith Pro at $19.90 covers both providers' models plus image and video, but on one shared credit balance that a heavy month can drain.

    The Tradeoffs

    Flowith Pros and Cons

    What we love

    • Branching canvas lets you compare and combine answers from different threads
    • Chat, image and video models from several providers in one subscription
    • Agent Neo handles research, documents, slides, video and websites
    • Per-model credit costs are published on the pricing page
    • Commercial license on every paid plan
    • Free Starter plan to try the canvas before paying

    What could be better

    • Credits reset every billing cycle and don't carry over
    • Refunds only within 48 hours and under 200 paid credits used
    • Unlimited Pack requires an annual Ultimate or Infinite plan
    • Terms promise only six months of standard content storage
    • No public API yet and no team or multi-seat plan
    • Free plan's 300 credits are one-time, not monthly

    The Audience

    Who Should Use Flowith?

    Best for: researchers and analysts

    Chase several lines of inquiry at once, then quote the strongest answers into one synthesis. Neo adds web research and Knowledge Garden keeps sources attached. Pro at $19.90 a month is enough to judge the fit.

    Best for: solo creators who make images and video

    One balance covers Nano Banana, GPT Image, Seedream, Seedance, Kling and Veo. If you generate every day, yearly Ultimate at $44.91 a month adds the Unlimited Pack for selected image models and a commercial license.

    Skip if: you're buying for a team

    Flowith accounts are single-user and can't be shared, and the pricing page lists no team plan or SSO. ChatGPT or Claude team plans, or MindStudio's Business plan, fit better.

    The Methodology

    How We Reviewed Flowith

    This is an editorial review, not a hands-on test. We didn't use a Flowith account. On October 11, 2026 we checked Flowith's pricing page (Monthly and Yearly toggles, comparison table, per-model credit costs), its docs on the canvas, Agent Neo and Knowledge Garden, help center articles on billing, credits, refunds and privacy, its updates page, terms of service and privacy policy. The cost scenarios are our calculations from published prices. Flowith doesn't publish top-up prices, a full public chat-model list, Android availability, support response times or security certifications, so we make no claims about them.

    Our editorial evaluation considers product information, official documentation, pricing, features and professional experience. It is not a claim of documented hands-on testing.

    Our review methodology →

    What changed

    • : Rebuilt in the full review format. Re-verified plans, both billing toggles, credit costs, Agent Neo, Knowledge Garden, refund and storage terms on October 11, 2026; Ultimate's Unlimited Pack is now annual-only, monthly Infinite showed $449.91, and terms now state six-month standard storage. Score unchanged.

    The Field

    Flowith vs The Competition

    Flowith competes with general AI assistants and with other agent workspaces. Starting prices were checked on each vendor's pricing page on October 11, 2026. Scores come from each tool's own BestStacked review where we have one.

    ToolStarting PriceFree planBest FeatureBS Score
    FlowithFree (300 one-time credits); Pro $19.90/mo or $17.91/mo billed yearlyYesBranching canvas8.8/10
    ChatGPTFree; Go $8/mo; Plus $20/moYesOpenAI's models with deep research, memory and Codex9.1/10
    ClaudeFree; Pro $17/mo billed annually ($20 monthly)YesLong-form writing, coding and Claude Code9/10
    PerplexityFree; Pro $17/mo billed annuallyYesCited answers and research across top models8.6/10
    ManusFree (300 daily credits); Pro $20/mo for 4,000 creditsYesGeneral agent with Wide Research and scheduled tasks8.3/10
    MindStudioFree (1 agent); Individual $16/mo billed yearly ($20 monthly)YesBuild reusable AI agents across 200+ models8.7/10

    ChatGPT: ChatGPT uses per-plan usage limits instead of credits, and its apps, memory and custom GPTs are more mature. Flowith adds other providers and the canvas.Read our ChatGPT review →

    Claude: Claude Pro is a better pick if you mainly write or code and want Anthropic's own apps and integrations. Flowith gives access to Claude models too, but on a shared credit balance.Read our Claude review →See Flowith vs Claude →

    Perplexity: Perplexity is built around cited search answers and its Computer agent. Flowith is broader on image and video and lets you branch research on a canvas.Read our Perplexity review →

    Manus: Manus is the closest match to Agent Neo: a credit-billed agent for research, websites and slides, with team plans. Flowith wraps its agent in a canvas with many chat and media models.Read our Manus review →

    MindStudio: MindStudio is for building reusable AI agents, with model usage charged on top of the plan. Flowith is for working with AI directly on a canvas.Read our MindStudio review →

    In The Wild

    How People Actually Use Flowith

    A market researcher

    Run Agent Neo on a competitor scan, branch follow-ups per competitor, attach past reports from Knowledge Garden and quote the findings into one brief. Flowith estimates about 36 Neo deep research tasks a month on Pro.

    A social media creator

    Generate post images in Nano Banana 2 and Seedream side by side, batch the winners and animate one into a Seedance clip. Yearly Ultimate ($44.91 a month) adds unlimited runs of the included models.

    A freelance consultant

    Turn a client brief into a research summary with Neo, then into a slide deck and a one-page site, and share the canvas with the client as a view-only replay.

    The Ecosystem

    Flowith Integrations

    Flowith's integrations are mostly the AI models and agent tools inside the product. It doesn't publish a public API or app connectors yet.

    • →Chat models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and DeepSeek
    • →Image models: Nano Banana, GPT Image, Seedream, Grok Image, Z Image Turbo
    • →Video models: Seedance, Kling, Wan, Veo 3.1
    • →Agent Neo tools: web search, live browser, Twitter/X search, email delivery
    • →Knowledge Garden imports: PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Markdown, text, images, web links
    • →Canvas sharing by link
    • →Custom integrations and API access (listed as coming soon on Infinite)

    Flowith can't connect to your CRM, Slack, Google Drive or Zapier today. API access is only "coming soon" on Infinite, and Flowith's fair-use rules ban external scripts that trigger canvas nodes.

    Common Questions

    Flowith FAQ

    The Final Word

    Should You Use Flowith?

    8.8/10 Score

    Flowith packs a lot into a $19.90 plan: chat models from several providers, image and video generation, an agent for research, slides and websites, and a canvas for branching and merging ideas. Its weak points are commercial: monthly credit resets, an annual commitment for the Unlimited Pack, a 48-hour refund window, six-month standard storage, and no API or team plan. Start free, move to monthly Pro, and go yearly only once you know your credit burn. Teams should look at ChatGPT or Claude; for cited answers, Perplexity. We score Flowith 8.8/10.

    Yes, if

    You're a solo creator or researcher paying for several AI tools and want chat, image, video and an agent on one canvas.

    No, if

    You need a team plan, an API, flat-rate unlimited use without an annual plan, or long-term storage of your work.

    About the reviewer

    Founder & Editor, The Best Network

    Carlos Gil is the bestselling author of The End of Marketing, a LinkedIn Top Voice, and founder of The Best Network. He brings 15+ years in marketing to practical reviews of AI, SaaS, email marketing, creator, and ecommerce software.

    Found this useful? Share it.

    Share

    Get the best of BestStacked

    The AI tools worth knowing. None of the noise.

    • New AI tool and software reviews as they publish
    • Head-to-head comparisons and stack breakdowns
    • The occasional recommendation worth knowing

    No fake urgency. No made-up weekly cadence. Unsubscribe anytime.